Count completions, not just starts
A team can feel busy while its delivery time lengthens. Work waiting for review is still work in the system. Little's Law provides a way to connect that inventory to the rate of completed work and the time an item spends inside a defined process.
MIT's operations teaching materials express the relationship as inventory equals throughput multiplied by average flow time. A separate MIT lean course uses the same relationship for work in progress and cycle time. The labels vary, so define the process boundary and units before comparing two dashboards.
An illustrative calculation
Suppose a stable review desk completes an average of four comparable articles a day and holds an average of twenty articles from submission through completion. Dividing twenty articles by four articles per day gives an average flow time of five days. These are invented inputs used to show the arithmetic; they are not this site's measured performance.
If the same desk holds forty articles while its completion rate remains four a day, the corresponding average becomes ten days. The calculation does not identify which editor, handoff or dependency caused the queue. It shows the consequence of the stated averages under the same boundary.
Where careless use breaks down
Do not combine starts from one process with completions from another. Keep time units consistent and account for discarded or withdrawn items. A rapidly expanding backlog is a warning against treating a short snapshot as steady operation. Use the relationship as a measurement check, then investigate the process before choosing a staffing or scheduling change.